Published on: March 25, 2014
by Senior Journal:
A nose spray that uses new technology to deliver drugs directly to the brain is being hailed by researchers at Canadas largest mental health and teaching hospital and the University of Toronto as a promising new way to treat depression.
The spray delivers a peptide (compound made of two or amino acids) to treat depression.
“This study marks the first time a peptide treatment has been delivered through nasal passageways to treat depression,” says Dr. Fang Liu, Professor in the University of Toronto’s Department of Psychiatry, who led the study with colleagues from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH).
The peptide treatment interferes with the binding of two dopamine receptors the D1 and D2 receptor complex. Dr. Liu’s team had found that this binding was higher in the brains of people with major depression. Disrupting the binding led to the anti-depressant effects.
The peptide is an entirely new approach to treating depression, which has previously relied on medications that primarily block serotonin or norepinephrine transporters.
Depression, the most common form of mental illness, is one of the leading causes of disability globally. More than 50 per cent of people living with depression do not respond to first-line medication treatment.
The technology for the nose-to-brain delivery was developed by the U.S. company Impel NeuroPharma. The company announced last March a successful trial with their Precision Olfactory Delivery (POD) technology that was seen as opening the door for central nervous system (CNS) drugs to be delivered directly to the human brain, allowing potential treatments for complex neurological conditions.
The study is published online in Neuropsychopharmacology.
In a previous study published in Nature Medicine in 2010, Dr. Liu developed a protein peptide that provided a highly targeted approach to treating depression that she hopes will have minimal side effects. The peptide was just as effective in relieving symptoms when compared to a conventional antidepressant in animal testing.
However, the peptide had to be injected into the brain. Taken orally, it would not cross the blood-brain barrier in sufficient concentrations.
“Clinically, we needed to find a non-invasive, convenient method to deliver this peptide treatment,” says Dr. Liu, Senior Scientist in the Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute at CAMH. With the support of a Proof of Principle grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Dr. Liu’s team was able to further explore novel delivery methods.
The Impel NeuroPharma system was shown to deliver the peptide to the correct part of the brain. It also relieved depression-like symptoms in animals.
“This research brings us one step closer to clinical trials,” says Dr. Liu. In ongoing lab research, her team is experimenting to determine if they can make the peptide break down more slowly, and travel more quickly in the brain, to improve its anti-depressant effects.
Older people who report greater levels of social engagement have more robust gray matter in regions of the brain relevant in dementia, according to new research led by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of...
In a new study, University of Nebraska–Lincoln sociologist Marc A. Garcia explored how educational attainment can benefit cognitive health in later life, and whether there are differences in its benefits among minorities. Garcia and his co-authors...
A genetic variation in some people may be associated with cognitive decline that can’t be explained by deposits of two key proteins associated with Alzheimer’s disease, amyloid β and tau, according to a study...
The material presented through the Think Tank feature on this website is in no way intended to replace professional medical care or attention by a qualified practitioner. WBHI strongly advises all questioners and viewers using this feature with health problems to consult a qualified physician, especially before starting any treatment. The materials provided on this website cannot and should not be used as a basis for diagnosis or choice of treatment. The materials are not exhaustive and cannot always respect all the most recent research in all areas of medicine.