Published on: July 17, 2017
by Alzheimer’s Association:
Research reported at the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference (AAIC) 2017 in London highlighted the clinical value of amyloid-β PET scans, which detect the presence of amyloid-beta plaques in the brain – one of the hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease. Studies also revealed an underutilization of amyloid-β PET imaging in clinical care, contributing to misdiagnosis of dementia.
Two studies at AAIC 2017 reported that brain PET imaging allows for more accurate detection or exclusion of Alzheimer’s in a larger proportion of individuals than standard clinical assessment supported by structural and metabolic imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and that use of amyloid PET scans may lead to a change in diagnosis in up to two-thirds of cases. A meta-analysis of data in a large population of participants found that brain amyloid PET scans led to a change in diagnosis in approximately 20 percent of these individuals.
Other PET-related research reported at AAIC 2017 included the following findings:
“A negative brain PET scan indicating sparse to no amyloid plaques rules out Alzheimer’s disease as the cause of dementia symptoms. This makes it a valuable tool to clarify an uncertain or difficult diagnosis,” said James A. Hendrix, PhD, Alzheimer’s Association Director of Global Science Initiatives. “Misdiagnosis is costly to health systems, and expensive and distressing to persons with dementia and their families.”
“Beyond the data reported at AAIC 2017, the IDEAS Study will provide further evidence to demonstrate the utility of amyloid PET imaging in a clinical setting,” said Hendrix. “A swift and accurate diagnosis has a huge impact on access to Alzheimer’s treatments, eligibility for research trials, plus much-needed support and information services.” The IDEAS Study is led by the Alzheimer’s Association and managed by the American College of Radiology and American College of Radiology Imaging Network.
Utilization of PET Scanning Greatly Enhanced Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease
Identification of amyloid-β in clinical practice has relied largely on CSF testing and the administration of cognitive and psychiatric tests that are not specific to Alzheimer’s disease. The emergence of PET imaging has been instrumental in advancing Alzheimer’s research, but despite the high rate of misdiagnosis in this disease, the prevailing wisdom has been that PET imaging does not provide sufficient additional diagnostic accuracy to justify its cost. Two small studies and a meta-analysis presented at AAIC are challenging that view.
In an ongoing study of individuals with cognitive complaints performed at Oslo University Hospital by Nenad Bogdanovic, MD, PhD, of the University of Oslo in Norway, amyloid PET imaging was found to be a key contributor to either diagnosing or excluding a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease in all 50 (100 percent) of participants. In contrast, CSF amyloid testing allowed for diagnosis or exclusion in 44 of 50 individuals (88 percent) using a higher detection cutoff and in only 21 individuals (42 percent) using traditional cutoffs.
As part of a 135-person study, doctoral student Antoine Leuzy, MSc, of Karolinska Institute in Stockholm and colleagues presented PET imaging results for 61 individuals diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (n=38), Alzheimer’s disease (n=13), other types of dementia (n=8) or severe cognitive impairment (n=2). PET imaging studies led to a change in diagnosis in 68 percent of these participants. Agreement between CSF testing and PET imaging was only 53–57 percent, depending on the approach used to read the PET scan. Where results disagreed, 75–77 percent of individuals were amyloid-β positive on PET scanning. Results from these small studies highlight not only the diagnostic value of PET but also the potential for misdiagnosis using traditional assessments.
Enrico Fantoni, PhD, of GE Healthcare in Amersham, UK, is performing an ongoing meta-analysis of four clinical trials conducted between 2000 and 2017 to evaluate the value of amyloid PET (aPET) in a large population of individuals with cognitive impairment. A preliminary evaluation of four studies with more than 1,100 clinical cases revealed that the use of aPET led to a change in diagnosis in over 20 percent of people independent of PET scan outcome.
Thus, aPET was valuable for excluding and confirming diagnoses of Alzheimer’s disease.
Limited Access Leads to Underutilization of PET Scanning
While research supports the value of PET scans for clarifying a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, Liana Apostolova, MD, of Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis and colleagues presented a study at AAIC 2017 that indicates that limited access to PET imaging is proving frustrating to individuals and their caregivers, and it leads to continued frequent misdiagnoses of people who would benefit from early intervention.
The team surveyed 510 participants and caregivers (predominantly in the U.S.) to gauge their attitudes about PET imaging as a part of patient care. Between 85 percent and 91 percent of respondents indicated they were dissatisfied with the availability of PET scans, supported additional research on PET imaging and were willing to undergo PET scans if they were recommended by their physician.
Medicare Claims Frequently Misidentify Dementia
Carolyn Zhu, PhD, of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York and colleagues analyzed data from 2,144 participants in the Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project and found that Medicare claims frequently misidentified dementia cases. The sample included 1,689 individuals not diagnosed with dementia and 455 with a clinical diagnosis of dementia based on a rigorous clinical assessment performed at study enrollment. Medicare claims prior to study enrollment allowed for successful identification of 1808 subjects (85 percent), suggesting moderate agreement between claims data and subsequent clinical diagnoses. However, 281 subjects (62 percent) diagnosed with dementia at study enrollment were not identified as such based on prior treatment reported in Medicare claims. These people were younger and had better general health and cognitive function than those identified as having dementia based on Medicare claims.
Thanks to the ongoing support of our partner Brain Canada, and The Citrine Foundation of Canada, Women’s Brain Health Initiative’s newest edition of MIND OVER MATTER has just been published. Loaded with interesting science-based articles, MIND OVER...
On December 2nd, in celebration of Women’s Brain Health Day, join thousands of others and take part in the Stand Ahead® Memory Challenge to stand up against research bias and stand ahead for women’s brain...
YOU’RE INVITED! On December 2nd, the second annual Women’s Brain Health Day, take the memory challenge and help us combat brain-aging diseases that disproportionately affect women. Join CTV’s Pattie Lovett-Reid and Anne-Marie Mediwake, along...
The material presented through the Think Tank feature on this website is in no way intended to replace professional medical care or attention by a qualified practitioner. WBHI strongly advises all questioners and viewers using this feature with health problems to consult a qualified physician, especially before starting any treatment. The materials provided on this website cannot and should not be used as a basis for diagnosis or choice of treatment. The materials are not exhaustive and cannot always respect all the most recent research in all areas of medicine.