Published on: June 23, 2015
Diabetes is a known risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia, age-related conditions that affect memory and thinking skills. However, little is known about how the diabetes-cognitive decline link compares across cultures.
Scientists from Mayo Clinic and Huashan Hospital in Shanghai explored the association between Type 2 diabetes and cognitive impairment to find out if the relationship varies in different populations. Study participants had not been diagnosed with memory-related diseases, such as vascular dementia or Alzheimer’s dementia.
For the study, the researchers evaluated data from two large, ongoing, population-based studies: the Shanghai Aging Study (SAS) and the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA). Both use similar designs and methodologies. For example, both studies recruit participants from a defined population, include an on-site, in-person evaluation, use similar or comparable tests of cognition, and include participants over age 50. The SAS uses neuropsychological tests adapted from Western tests to harmonize with Chinese culture.
The scientists analyzed medical data from 3,348 Chinese adults and 3,734 American adults, all of whom had undergone cognitive testing and were dementia-free. Participants’ medical records were used to determine whether they had Type 2 diabetes.
The researchers found that all of the participants who had Type 2 diabetes, regardless of their population study, performed significantly worse on cognitive tests, compared to participants who did not have diabetes. These findings suggest that diabetes is linked to cognitive impairment in both Eastern and Western cultures.
‘We wanted to study diabetes and cognitive impairment in these two completely different ethnic groups to see whether there are any differences. We found that in both cohorts, having a history of diabetes was associated with greater impairment in cognitive function,’ says study co-author Rosebud Roberts, M.B., Ch.B., an epidemiologist at Mayo Clinic.
The results were the same — even after adjusting for age, gender and education, as well as vascular problems. More specifically, the American and Chinese study participants with diabetes performed considerably worse on executive function tests, compared to people in both study populations who did not have diabetes. Executive function is the ability to make decisions, plan and problem-solve, and is associated with the frontal lobe of the brain.
In the Shanghai population, a diabetes diagnosis also was associated with poorer performance on tests of memory, visual-spatial skills and language. One possible reason for this difference is that the population studied by the SAS developed diabetes at an earlier age, compared to the MCSA population.
Roberts says the research is important, because it shows that impairment in executive function may be an early effect of diabetes, and earlier age at diabetes diagnosis results in greater cognitive deficits. However, she adds, the overall effects of diabetes on cognition are similar in Western and Eastern populations.
CTV's Pattie Lovett-Reid and Anne-Marie Mediwake host a virtual fundraising event featuring special guests and musical performances and Stand Ahead® for women’s brain health.
Thanks to the ongoing support of our partner Brain Canada, and The Citrine Foundation of Canada, Women’s Brain Health Initiative’s newest edition of MIND OVER MATTER has just been published. Loaded with interesting science-based articles, MIND OVER...
On December 2nd, in celebration of Women’s Brain Health Day, join thousands of others and take part in the Stand Ahead® Memory Challenge to stand up against research bias and stand ahead for women’s brain...
The material presented through the Think Tank feature on this website is in no way intended to replace professional medical care or attention by a qualified practitioner. WBHI strongly advises all questioners and viewers using this feature with health problems to consult a qualified physician, especially before starting any treatment. The materials provided on this website cannot and should not be used as a basis for diagnosis or choice of treatment. The materials are not exhaustive and cannot always respect all the most recent research in all areas of medicine.